Leaders and farmers discuss ag issues at Farmfest

Leaders and farmers discuss ag issues at Farmfest

Each year many key issues are discussed as part of the various candidate debates and feature forums at FARMFEST. The 2016 farm show was held on Aug. 2-4 in Redwood County, Minnesota.

A variety of Congressional candidates, along with national and state agricultural leaders and policy makers discussed and analyzed many of the current key issues affecting farm families and rural communities across Minnesota and the Midwest.

Following are some of the main issues that were discussed during FARMFEST this year:

Farm financial challenges

Whether it was FARMFEST Forum panel members or the farmers attending the event, the current tight margins and low profitability was on everyone’s mind. Profit margins in crop production are at the tightest level in many years, and some producers are facing negative profit projections for the 2016 crop year.

Crop production expenses and land rental rates have remained relatively high for many farm operators, while crop prices for corn, soybeans and wheat have dropped dramatically in the past couple of years. For farmers with below average crop yields in 2016, due to weather issues, the situation may be even more severe.

The livestock sector is not faring any better that the crop sector from a profitability standpoint. Dairy farmers have been dealing with very low milk prices for the past couple of years, which has resulted in negative profit margins for many producers. Cattle feedlot operators have also faced negative margins at most times during the past year or so. Hog producers have been able to show a slight profit margin at most times in 2015 and 2016, due to the lower feed costs; however, projected lower market prices in the hog sector will likely create profit challenges for the hog industry as well in the coming months.

The 2018 farm bill

Most farm operators are just beginning to understand the current Farm bill and farm programs that were implemented beginning with the 2014 crop year, and will be in place through the 2018 crop year. However, many ag policy experts and farm leaders are already beginning to discuss the writing of the next Farm bill by Congress in 2018.

There is a lot of concern over the payment calculations in the current county-based Ag Risk Coverage (ARC-CO) farm program option that over 90 percent of the corn and soybean producers in the Upper Midwest are enrolled in for the 2014-2018 crop years. The ARC-CO payments for a given crop in a crop year can vary widely from county-to-county due to the payment calculation formula. In addition, the payment levels will likely decline for the 2017 and 2018 crop years, when crop producers could potentially be facing some serious financial challenges.

The Dairy Margin Protection Program has also not been as effective as anticipated to help dairy producers offset the current low profit margins. Some concern was also raised regarding the reduced level of maximum CRP acres allowed under the current farm bill. Finding adequate funding for current or expanded farm programs could be a challenge when Congress writes the next farm bill.

Congressional candidates were split on whether the next farm bill should continue to contain the Food and Nutrition Title, which funds the “Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program” (SNAP), and utilizes approximately 75-80% of the funds expended on the farm bill, or if those programs should be funded separately. Experienced ag policy experts warn that funding for ag commodity programs could become more difficult in the future, if the farm programs and the SNAP programs are separated by Congress.  

Crop insurance

Many farm operators are concerned about the future of the federal crop insurance program, which is probably the best risk management tool that crop producers have available to them. The federal government currently covers approximately 60 percent of the premium cost for most common levels of crop insurance coverage that is purchased by farmers.

Some non-ag groups are pushing to have the federal subsidy for crop insurance greatly reduced, or even eliminated. This could result in crop insurance becoming too expensive for some producers, and lead to crop financing issues with ag lenders. Others have pushed to eliminate the larger farm operators from the subsidized crop insurance coverage. If these producers drop out of the crop insurance program, it may limit the number of private companies offering federal crop insurance coverage to farm operators. 

Ag water quality issues

It seems that everywhere you turn these days, ag water quality issues are on the forefront. In Minnesota, a new “Buffer Law” was passed by the state legislature in 2015 and signed into law, and later updated by the 2016 state legislature. The 2016 update clarified that the “Buffer Law” only affects public ditches, streams, etc., and not private ditches and waterways.

The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) has completed the mapping of the ditches that require buffers. The mapping and other details on the new Minnesota “Buffer Law” are available through local soil and water conservation district offices, or through the state board of soil and water Resources (BWSR). Another excellent resource on the new “Buffer Law” and other ag water quality issues is the Minnesota Agriculture Water Resource Center web site at : http://mawrc.org/

The federal authority under the Clean Water Act provision known as the “Waters of the United States” (WOTUS) also has farm operators across the nation concerned. Many agricultural leaders fear that the Federal Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) will use perceived WOTUS authority to invoke practices and requirements on private farm land, which could alter future crop production practices and livestock grazing. The WOTUS issue is likely to be debated in Congress and challenged in the federal courts in the coming years.

These issues and many other ag-related topics were discussed during FARMFEST, and these discussions and debates will likely continue into this fall’s national and state elections, as well as into the 2017 Congressional and State Legislative sessions. Many farm organizations and agricultural commodity groups will also continue to keep farm operators informed about these key issues, and what the impacts might be on their farm operations in the future.  

Hide comments

Comments

  • Allowed HTML tags: <em> <strong> <blockquote> <br> <p>

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Publish