Researchers revisit USDA corn and soybean stock estimates

Researchers revisit USDA corn and soybean stock estimates

USDA grain stocks reports gives market a surprise

The June 1 estimates of corn and soybean stocks released by the USDA on June 30 provided some big surprises.

The corn stocks estimate was about 200 million bushels larger than anticipated, while the soybean stocks estimate was about 40 million bushels larger than anticipated.

The larger corn stocks estimate has especially contributed to the "heaviness" of corn prices in recent weeks. This certainly has not been the only example of the USDA grain stocks reports providing a major surprise to the market in recent years.

In fact, the grain stocks estimates have generated enough controversy that the Office of the Chief Economist of the USDA commissioned a study to examine this, and other, issues related to USDA forecasts.

Several farmdoc daily articles subsequently featured different parts of the study.  The study found that there had indeed been a sharp decline in analysts' ability to anticipate actual quarterly corn stock estimates beginning with the start of the 2006 marketing year.

The availability of data for three more marketing years provides an opportunity to update our previous analysis and determine whether the "problem" with corn stocks estimates has continued or not. In addition, we also analyze in this article the typical degree of uncertainty in the crucial September 1 corn and soybean stock estimates.

USDA Grain Stocks Estimates

The National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS) of the USDA provides estimates of U.S. corn and soybean stocks at the end of each quarter of the marketing year. The reference dates for those estimates are Dec. 1, March 1, June 1, and Sept. 1.

Estimates of on-farm grain stocks are based on data collected in the quarterly Agricultural Surveys in which a sample of producers are asked to identify the storage capacity of all structures normally used to store whole grains or oilseeds and to estimate the total number of bushels of corn and soybeans stored on the reference date on the total acres operated by the respondent regardless of ownership or intended use of the crops.

The report form does not instruct on-farm survey respondents to report the number of 56-pound bushels of corn and 60-pound bushels of soybeans. NASS apparently assumes on-farm respondents use these standards without prompting.

For the December report, estimates of un-harvested production are also included in the stocks estimate. Respondents are specifically asked to estimate the number of acres and expected yield for crops remaining to be harvested for the current crop year.

Respondents are also asked if the un-harvested production was included in the respondent's estimate of stocks on hand. For the September report, respondents are specifically asked to exclude any new crop inventories. Stocks estimates are imputed for non-respondents.

Sample size

The sample size for the Agricultural Surveys is large in order to provide sufficient observations needed for statistical rigor when the range of potential responses is very large.

In a recent survey cycle, the sample size was 96,022 in June, 65,953 in September, 82,760 in December, and 83,089 in March (Prusacki, 2013). The sample consisted of 2,804 very large farms and 6,390 farms identified in the June Area Survey that were missing from the NASS list of farm operators. These two groups were surveyed every quarter. The rest of the sample was drawn from the NASS list of farm operators and the number and make-up of those respondents varied by quarter.

Grain estimates

Estimates of off-farm stocks of corn and soybeans are based on data collected in the Grain Stocks report from mills, elevators, warehouses, and other storage facilities. This survey is intended to be a census of all commercial facilities.

Respondents are asked to identify the number of storage locations operated and being reported, the rated storage capacity of all locations being reported, and to estimate the number of bushels of corn and soybeans stored at those facilities on the reference date.

The report form reminds off-farm survey respondents to report the number of 56-pound bushels of corn and 60-pound bushels of soybeans.

For the Sept. 1 report, respondents are also asked to separately estimate stocks harvested in previous crop years (old crop) and stocks harvested in the current crop year (new crop).

The survey procedures for the quarterly stocks estimates is expected to provide relatively accurate stocks estimates even though the sampling variability for the on-farm stocks estimate is relatively large for some quarters. The relative standard errors reported for the 2014-15 marketing year were as follows:

 

Corn

Soybeans

December 1, 2014

1.50%

1.90%

March 1, 2015

2.10%

3.00%

June 1, 2015

2.70%

3.50%

September 1, 2015

4.40%

7.10%

There is an interesting pattern of increasing standard errors through the marketing year, with the September 1 standard error for corn and soybeans 2.9 and 5.2 percentage points, respectively, larger than the December 1 standard error. This presumably reflects the smaller number of farm operators holding corn and soybeans as the marketing year progresses, which, all else constant, would result in smaller sample sizes for estimating on-farm stocks.

For further perspective, the on-farm stocks standard errors can also be compared to the standard errors of 1.1% reported for corn and 1.0% for soybean yield indications from the farm operator survey for the 2015 U.S. production estimates released in January 2016.

However, the objective yield indications reflected in that report are also subject to sampling variability since only a sample of crop acreage is included in that survey. In contrast, the survey for the off-farm grain stocks estimates is a near census of commercial facilities, and therefore, estimates are not subject to sampling error (but may contain non-sampling errors).

Analysis

NASS estimates of quarterly grain stocks provide important market information regarding the magnitude of consumption during the previous quarter of the marketing year as well the supply available for future consumption.

Unlike the USDA crop production forecasts, which can be compared to a final production estimate in order to evaluate forecast accuracy, there is no independent estimate for judging the accuracy of quarterly NASS stocks estimates.

Instead, we analyze the history of the NASS quarterly corn and soybean stocks estimates relative to pre-release estimates by private sector analysts. While this type of analysis is limited due to the lack of a "final" benchmark, the history of differences between USDA and analyst stocks estimates should reveal estimates that market analysts find particularly problematic.

Newswires report the expected stocks estimates of various market analysts from which an average analyst estimate is computed. Using the average analyst estimates reported by the Dow Jones Newswire (or their predecessor, Oster Dow Jones and Knight Ridder) or Reuters, the difference from NASS stocks estimates was calculated for each quarter for the 1990-91 through 2015-16 marketing years.

Use estimates

Since analysts' estimates of stocks are really estimates of usage or implied usage during the quarter that ends with the reference date of the NASS Grain Stocks report, we compute the differences as a percentage of quarterly usage (see the appendix for technical details). This difference is commonly referred to as the "market surprise."

Figure 1 presents the history of surprises for NASS implied usage estimates for corn over the 1990-91 - 2015-16 marketing years in chronological order. Note that a positive surprise implies that market analysts under-estimated usage (over-estimated stocks) and a negative surprise implies analysts over-estimated usage (under-estimated stocks).

This figure highlights the sharp increase in the volatility of market surprises for implied corn usage that occurred over 2006-07 - 2012-13. There were only seven instances out of 64 over 1990-2005 where the surprise exceeded 5 percent. In contrast, over 2006-2012, there were 12 instances out of 28 where the surprise exceeded 5 percent.

Furthermore, double-digit usage surprises occurred three times during 2006-2012 (-11.55 percent: June-August 2009; -12.13 percent: March-May 2010; -14.67 percent: December-February 2012), and each substantially exceeded the largest surprise observed over 1990-2005 (+7.78 percent: March-May 1995).

University of Illinois- Figure 1-Market-surprise- for -implied -use- of- corn

There have been 11 quarterly stocks reports released since our original analysis was completed at the end of the 2012-13 marketing year, with the latest being for June 1, 2016.

In absolute terms, the usage surprises revealed in those reports ranged from 0.29 to 6.26 percent and averaged about 3.1 percent (in absolute value). That compares to the period 2006-07 through 2012-13 when the quarterly usage surprise, in absolute terms, ranged from 0.17 to 14.67 percent and averaged 5.1 percent.

The more recent observations indicate that the issues associated with surprises in the USDA corn stocks estimates that were most notable in the 2009-10 through 2012-13 marketing years, when the usage surprise averaged 6.4 percent, have mostly disappeared.

History

Figure 2 presents the history of surprises for NASS implied usage estimates for soybeans over the 1990-91 through 2015-16 marketing years in chronological order. The contrast in the pattern of implied usage surprises for soybeans across all quarters in Figure 2 with that of corn in Figure 1 is striking.

Unlike corn, there is little evidence that quarterly soybean usage surprises in the period from 2006-07 through 2012-13 were outside of previous historical ranges. The average absolute surprise was 3.6 percent during the 1990-91 through 2005-06 period and 4.1 percent during 2006-07 through 2012-13. However, the usage surprise in absolute terms exceeded five percent in 8 of the 28 years in the latter period and only 10 out of 64 times in the earlier period.

University-of-Illinois-Market surprise-estimates for soybeans

In the 11 stocks reports following the 2012-13 marketing year, the absolute value of the quarterly soybean usage surprise ranged from 0.3 to 10.9 percent, averaged 4.2 percent, and exceeded five percent four times. The pattern of soybean surprises remains similar to that of 2006 -07 to 2012-13.

There is one remaining stock estimate (September 1) for the 2015-16 marketing year. As indicated in Figures 3 and 4, there have been some relatively large surprises in the Sept. 1 stocks estimate for both crops (measured in bushels) particularly in recent years.

Given the relatively large sampling variability associated with the Sept. 1 on-farm stocks estimate as described earlier, large surprises in the Sept. 1 stocks estimate might be expected more often than for the other three estimates and cannot be ruled out for this year.

However, for the entire period starting in 1990-91, the average absolute magnitude of the usage surprise provided by the Sept. 1 corn stocks estimate has not been much different than other quarters (3.1 percent vs. 3.0 to 3.4 percent).

In contrast, for soybeans, the average surprise provided by the September stocks estimate (5 percent) has been larger than the average surprise for the other three quarters (3.2 to 3.6 percent).

University of Illinois-Figure 3-market surprise for sept-grain-stocks

 

University of Illinois- figure4-market surprise-for-Sept. 1-grain stocks

Implications

A major controversy about USDA grain stocks estimates erupted during the last decade. We found in an earlier study that there had indeed been a sharp decline in analysts' ability to anticipate actual quarterly corn stock estimates over the 2006-07 through 2012-13 marketing year.

The availability of data for three more marketing years provides an opportunity to update our previous analysis and determine whether the "problem" with corn stocks estimates has continued or not. Interestingly, usage surprises stemming from USDA's quarterly estimates of corn stocks have been less pronounced since the 2012-13 marketing year.

This reinforces our previous conclusion that there was nothing inherently amiss with the USDA's corn stocks estimates and the decline in analysts' ability to anticipate actual quarterly corn stock estimates was most likely explained by unusually large and unresolved sampling errors in USDA corn production estimates, particularly for the 2009, 2010, and 2012 crops.

For additional perspective, the pattern of surprises provided by the quarterly soybean stocks estimates has been fairly consistent since 1990-91 and did not change much in the most recent period of 2013-14 through June 1 of the 2015-16 marketing year.

For the current marketing year, usage surprises stemming from the Dec. 1, 2015 and March, 1 2016 stocks estimates were quite small, averaging less than one percent for corn and less than two percent for soybeans (in absolute terms).

The usage surprises stemming from the June 1 stocks estimates, however, exceeded six percent for both crops, providing further evidence that the USDA grain stocks estimates can be difficult to anticipate with a high degree of accuracy. The next quarterly stocks estimates will be released on Sept. 30.

Hide comments

Comments

  • Allowed HTML tags: <em> <strong> <blockquote> <br> <p>

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Publish